I realise that this review is several months too late to capitalise on the buzz this book generated with the Man Booker award, but it still worth discussing.
The first half of this book could have been narrated by Holden Caulfield of Catcher in the Rye fame. It is literary in the sense that any book that doesn’t have a car chase in it has become labelled literary; it deals with the popular undergrad topics of memory and unresolved endings. Tony Webster discusses his friends, his uneventful life, his divorce and his mostly comfortable relationship with his ex-wife. The plot hook is provided by a friend’s suicide and a lawyer’s letter stating that some items of the deceased were left to him in spite of years of failed communication. The usual spiteful interactions between old enemies with shared relationships ensue, an admittedly decent twist is revealed and the novel ends with a rumbling “there is great unrest.”
Honestly, I haven’t read any of the other Man Booker candidates, as many of them are not available in South Africa and Sense was given to me as a proof copy, slipped amongst the usual crime thrillers that publishing houses give out like candy to drum up support. But if this was considered the best of the bunch, I’m not so sure that they should have given out the prize at all. I’ve discussed the Man Booker before; I’m still less than enamoured of book prizes for their refusal to admit to their subjectivity and therefore shortcomings. Many of the judges in these competitions aren’t even authors, unaware of the backbreaking work that can go into a great novel only for it to be dismissed as too mainstream or literary. I’m just a humble blogger that has minimal impact on a book, and none on the industry. But there’s a difference between myself and panel dishing out tens of thousands in Euros. I am not making and breaking careers, and I am not subject to politics.
The reason why I don’t think this book is that groundbreaking is because it reads like a pastiche of all the setworks foisted upon English literature undergrads. There’s the fallible narrator with his dodgy memory, and who is a part-time focuser for the character of suicidal Adrian. (Ian McEwan was triumphant in this with Atonement.) There are the endless literary allusions that makes people like me smug for catching them and other people bored. Its obviousness makes it ham-handed compared to Salman Rushdie’s masterful handling of intertextual allusion (see the Milton references in The Satanic Verses), or TS Eliot’s for that matter. I did enjoy the posturing of the young men as they aspired to endless wit and glamorously tragic deaths, as much as it painfully reminded me of my first year self. (I’m not entirely sure such unwarranted posturing ever stopped.)
I feel that Sense of an Ending is literary, but it is obviously so. Since literary is now a label attached to anything that isn’t crime, romance or non-fiction and has a serious topic, it fails to mean anything. What I consider literary is considered nigh unreadable by most, and my understanding of it usually excludes the general publishing perspective. Language of Flowers was marketed as the literary answer to Eat, Pray, Love; I still found it as mainstream as the latter. I will never apologise for my taste in books, but I freely admit to my strange and obscure tastes. Sense did interest me on some levels; the pretentious undergrad in me will never die, but my postgrad self found the protagonist as interesting as dried toast. Tony was surrounded by far more interesting characters, and perhaps it was the author’s point. Not everyone in the world is fascinating or charming or even mildly entertaining. Tony is a middle-aged, lonely, unambitious man who has some drama thrust upon him and some scathing altercations. By the end he is unchanged, nothing is solved and I imagine it is one of the points that has had it labelled as literary and therefore for the attention of the Man Booker panel. I know that a literary title will have an open or unclear ending and sometimes it is superbly done (consider Bee Season) but to just say ‘and he went on and nothing changed’ is boring. He contemplates what-ifs, which is more like a misery memoir than actually thought-provoking.
In short, Sense is a short, mostly pretentious read that deals with memory, suicide and human interactions. It had the potential to be something of Catcher in the Rye calibre, but ended up being a bit pretentious and boring. Like a corporate cocktail party with one or two good speeches and some nice drinks but little more than that.
You know, I tried so hard with this book. I loved it until one character was introduced that just Ruined Everything. Thad was likable, someone who had worked so hard to overcome his background and difficulties to work at NASA. He tried to reinvent himself, and was exciting and flawed. Yes, he was a brat but he was also kind and hardworking and it was something admirable. The detail about NASA was superb, making me long to be an astronaut. (When I was little, I really did want to be one. I have always loved travel, and isn’t that the height of it?)
And then She Ruined Everything.
The love interest was introduced, and she was deeply boring. She was too perfect. Hot with a perfect body and super intelligent and outdoorsy and kind and nice and blah-blah. I couldn’t relate to this woman. She was so perfect as to be two-dimensional and I thought “Deliver me from clear skin and perfect teeth”. I tried to struggle past that, and I read up to page 195 before I gave up on it.
Now I didn’t care what happened to Thad, because he was besotted with this inexpliacably perfect creature and had lost all the vulnrability that had made him so relateable in the first place. She was soooo popular, and liek, hot. And stuff. Suddenly I was reading some teenage, drippy romance instead of a thoughtful and exciting heist story. It wasn’t what I signed up for. If she had been a little more human, with maybe a skew nose or a little pudge or even shy, it would have added depth to the relationship. But then she became Bella Swann (I can’t even remember her name, Liza I think it was) and I was immensely disappointed.
So Sex On The Moon was set to be my book of the year. And then it punched me in the face and giggled.